Journal Browser
Journal Article

Critically assess both the value of, and the challenges that face, comparative juvenile or youth justice research

by ShiYao Wang 1
1
Independent author
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: / Accepted: / Published Online: 26 February 2025

Abstract

This paper critically assesses the value and challenges of comparative juvenile justice research, emphasizing the importance of understanding juvenile delinquency and the different justice systems in place across various nations. The research highlights the value of juvenile justice studies in promoting social fairness, judicial justice, and the rehabilitation of young offenders. It also explores the diverse methods and policies adopted by countries like the United States, Australia, and others, illustrating the differences in approaches to crime prevention, rehabilitation, and recidivism. However, the paper also discusses significant challenges, such as the complexity of legal frameworks, the age of criminal responsibility, and the difficulties in obtaining accurate data due to privacy concerns. Through a critical comparative approach, the paper calls for more inclusive, interdisciplinary research to address the challenges juvenile justice systems face and to create more effective policies for youth rehabilitation and crime prevention.


Copyright: © 2025 by Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Cite This Paper
APA Style
Wang, S. (2025). Critically assess both the value of, and the challenges that face, comparative juvenile or youth justice research. Perspectives in Social Sciences and Arts, 4(1), 17. doi:10.69610/j.pssa.20250226
ACS Style
Wang, S. Critically assess both the value of, and the challenges that face, comparative juvenile or youth justice research. Perspectives in Social Sciences and Arts, 2025, 4, 17. doi:10.69610/j.pssa.20250226
AMA Style
Wang S. Critically assess both the value of, and the challenges that face, comparative juvenile or youth justice research. Perspectives in Social Sciences and Arts; 2025, 4(1):17. doi:10.69610/j.pssa.20250226
Chicago/Turabian Style
Wang, ShiYao 2025. "Critically assess both the value of, and the challenges that face, comparative juvenile or youth justice research" Perspectives in Social Sciences and Arts 4, no.1:17. doi:10.69610/j.pssa.20250226

Share and Cite

ACS Style
Wang, S. Critically assess both the value of, and the challenges that face, comparative juvenile or youth justice research. Perspectives in Social Sciences and Arts, 2025, 4, 17. doi:10.69610/j.pssa.20250226
AMA Style
Wang S. Critically assess both the value of, and the challenges that face, comparative juvenile or youth justice research. Perspectives in Social Sciences and Arts; 2025, 4(1):17. doi:10.69610/j.pssa.20250226
Chicago/Turabian Style
Wang, ShiYao 2025. "Critically assess both the value of, and the challenges that face, comparative juvenile or youth justice research" Perspectives in Social Sciences and Arts 4, no.1:17. doi:10.69610/j.pssa.20250226
APA style
Wang, S. (2025). Critically assess both the value of, and the challenges that face, comparative juvenile or youth justice research. Perspectives in Social Sciences and Arts, 4(1), 17. doi:10.69610/j.pssa.20250226

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

References

  1. Bazemore, G. and J. Hudson, et al. (2013). Juvenile justice reform and restorative justice, Willan.
  2. Cauffman, E. and L. Steinberg (2012). "Emerging findings from research on adolescent development and juvenile justice." Victims & Offenders 7 (4): 428-449.
  3. Evans-Chase, M. and H. Zhou (2014). "A systematic review of the juvenile justice intervention literature: What it can (and cannot) tell us about what works with delinquent youth." Crime & Delinquency 60 (3): 451-470.
  4. Frieberg, A. and R. Fox, et al. (1989). "Procedural justice in sentencing Australian juveniles." Monash UL Rev. 15: 279.
  5. Gottesman, D. M. and S. W. Schwarz (2011). "Juvenile justice in the US: Facts for policymakers.".
  6. JANEKSELA, G. M. (1991). "DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS OF FIVE JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEMS: UNITED STATES, SCOTLAND, ENGLAND, INDIA, AND SOUTH AFRICA." International Review of Modern Sociology 21 (1): 1-19.
  7. Lipsey, M. W. and J. C. Howell, et al. (2010). "Improving the effectiveness of juvenile justice programs." Washington DC: Center for Juvenile Justice Reform at Georgetown University.
  8. Parsloe, Phyllida 1978 "Juvenile Justice in Britain and the United States: The Balance of Needs and Rights." Boston, Mass.: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  9. Picart, V. I. (2017). "Re-Sentencing Reform: A Comparative Analysis of the Juvenile Justice System in the United States, United Kingdom, Colombia and Australia." ILSA J. Int'l & Comp. L. 24: 477.
  10. Waye, V. and P. Marcus (2009). "Australia and the united states: Two common criminal justice systems uncommonly at odds, part 2." Tul. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 18: 335.
  11. Willison, J. B. and D. P. Mears, et al. (2010). "Past, present, and future of juvenile justice: Assessing the policy options (APO)." Washington DC: The Urban Institute.
  12. Wool, J. and D. Stemen (2004). "Changing fortunes or changing attitudes? Sentencing and corrections reforms in 2003." Federal Sentencing Reporter 16 (4): 294-306.
  13. Zalkind, P. and R. J. Simon (2004). Global perspectives on social issues: Juvenile justice systems, Lexington Books.